2002 Alfa Romeo 156 vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mazda CU-X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mazda CU-X would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 (189 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 40 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156. (218 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Alfa Romeo 156.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Alfa Romeo 156 | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | 156 | CU-X |
Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2492 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1385 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 80 L |