2002 Audi RS6 vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 2002 Audi RS6 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 4,161 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Audi RS6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Audi RS6 weights approximately 675 kg more than 1952 Riley RM A.
Because 2002 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Audi RS6 | 1952 Riley RM A | |
Make | Audi | Riley |
Model | RS6 | RM A |
Year Released | 2002 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 444 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2870 mm |