2002 Cadillac CTS vs. 1981 GMC Jimmy
To start off, 2002 Cadillac CTS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 GMC Jimmy. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 GMC Jimmy would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 GMC Jimmy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1981 GMC Jimmy. (130 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1981 GMC Jimmy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 GMC Jimmy weights approximately 212 kg more than 2002 Cadillac CTS.
Because 1981 GMC Jimmy is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 GMC Jimmy will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac CTS (296 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 GMC Jimmy. (285 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2002 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 GMC Jimmy.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Cadillac CTS | 1981 GMC Jimmy | |
Make | Cadillac | GMC |
Model | CTS | Jimmy |
Year Released | 2002 | 1981 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 4093 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 296 Nm | 285 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1618 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2720 mm |