2002 Cadillac Le Mans vs. 1969 Oldsmobile Toronado
To start off, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Oldsmobile Toronado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Oldsmobile Toronado would be higher. At 6,967 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Oldsmobile Toronado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans (600 HP) has 215 more horse power than 1969 Oldsmobile Toronado. (385 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans should accelerate faster than 1969 Oldsmobile Toronado.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Oldsmobile Toronado (644 Nm) has 244 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Cadillac Le Mans. (400 Nm). This means 1969 Oldsmobile Toronado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Cadillac Le Mans.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Cadillac Le Mans | 1969 Oldsmobile Toronado | |
| Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Le Mans | Toronado |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 4000 cc | 6967 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 600 HP | 385 HP |
| Torque | 400 Nm | 644 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 104.8 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 73.4 mm | 101 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 1 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4660 mm | 5370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1030 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3030 mm |
