2002 Chrysler Neon vs. 1966 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 2002 Chrysler Neon is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,728 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cougar (129 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2002 Chrysler Neon. (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 2002 Chrysler Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 216 kg more than 2002 Chrysler Neon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Chrysler Neon 1966 Mercury Cougar
Make Chrysler Mercury
Model Neon Cougar
Year Released 2002 1966
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1796 cc 4728 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 114 HP 129 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 4400 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1146 kg 1362 kg
Vehicle Length 4400 mm 4990 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2650 mm 2830 mm