2002 Dodge Neon vs. 1973 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2002 Dodge Neon is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Neon (212 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 1973 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 42 kg more than 2002 Dodge Neon.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Dodge Neon (304 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2002 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Dodge Neon | 1973 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Dodge | Triumph |
| Model | Neon | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 304 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1206 kg | 1248 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2700 mm |
