2002 Eagle Talon vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Eagle Talon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Eagle Talon would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Eagle Talon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Eagle Talon (209 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision. (141 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Eagle Talon should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision weights approximately 25 kg more than 2002 Eagle Talon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision (300 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Eagle Talon. (290 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Eagle Talon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Eagle Talon | 2004 Mercedes-Benz Vision | |
| Make | Eagle | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Talon | Vision |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1689 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 209 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 290 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1445 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2860 mm |
