2002 Honda Acty vs. 1968 Volvo 120
To start off, 2002 Honda Acty is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,777 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Volvo 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Honda Acty (127 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1968 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty should accelerate faster than 1968 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Volvo 120 weights approximately 170 kg more than 2002 Honda Acty.
Because 1968 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Acty, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Volvo 120 (144 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Honda Acty. (139 Nm). This means 1968 Volvo 120 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Honda Acty.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Honda Acty | 1968 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Honda | Volvo |
Model | Acty | 120 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 660 cc | 1777 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 139 Nm | 144 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 840 kg | 1010 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2610 mm |