2002 Jeep Willys 2 vs. 1979 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2002 Jeep Willys 2 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Willys 2 (160 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1979 Mercury Cougar. (134 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Willys 2 should accelerate faster than 1979 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 540 kg more than 2002 Jeep Willys 2.
Because 2002 Jeep Willys 2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Willys 2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Mercury Cougar (336 Nm) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jeep Willys 2. (210 Nm). This means 1979 Mercury Cougar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jeep Willys 2.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Jeep Willys 2 | 1979 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | Jeep | Mercury |
Model | Willys 2 | Cougar |
Year Released | 2002 | 1979 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 210 Nm | 336 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1315 kg | 1855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 5480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2420 mm | 2910 mm |