2002 Lada Samara II vs. 2004 Spyker C8
To start off, 2004 Spyker C8 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Lada Samara II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Lada Samara II would be higher. At 3,999 cc, 2004 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Spyker C8 weights approximately 380 kg more than 2002 Lada Samara II.
Because 2004 Spyker C8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Spyker C8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Lada Samara II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Lada Samara II | 2004 Spyker C8 | |
| Make | Lada | Spyker |
| Model | Samara II | C8 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 3999 cc |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2680 mm |
