2002 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2007 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2007 Ford Ecosport is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 139 more horse power than 2007 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Ford Ecosport. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 2007 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2007 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Land Rover Range Rover | 2007 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Land Rover | Ford |
Model | Range Rover | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2002 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 282 HP | 143 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2490 mm |