2002 Mazda 6 vs. 1964 MG 1100
To start off, 2002 Mazda 6 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mazda 6 (130 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda 6 weights approximately 600 kg more than 1964 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mazda 6 (188 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2002 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Mazda 6 | 1964 MG 1100 | |
Make | Mazda | MG |
Model | 6 | 1100 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 188 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1425 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2380 mm |