2002 MCC Smart vs. 1969 Pontiac GTO
To start off, 2002 MCC Smart is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Pontiac GTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Pontiac GTO would be higher. At 6,548 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Pontiac GTO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Pontiac GTO (425 HP) has 345 more horse power than 2002 MCC Smart. (80 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Pontiac GTO should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Pontiac GTO weights approximately 610 kg more than 2002 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 MCC Smart | 1969 Pontiac GTO | |
Make | MCC | Pontiac |
Model | Smart | GTO |
Year Released | 2002 | 1969 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 698 cc | 6548 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 425 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 66.5 mm | 104.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67 mm | 95.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3430 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 69 L |