2003 BMW 520 vs. 1964 Renault 4
To start off, 2003 BMW 520 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Renault 4 would be higher. At 2,170 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 BMW 520 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 BMW 520 (167 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1964 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 BMW 520 should accelerate faster than 1964 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 BMW 520 weights approximately 1016 kg more than 1964 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 BMW 520 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 BMW 520. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 BMW 520 | 1964 Renault 4 | |
| Make | BMW | Renault |
| Model | 520 | 4 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2170 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 167 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1670 kg | 654 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 38 L |
