2003 Cadillac CTS vs. 1985 Citroen CX
To start off, 2003 Cadillac CTS is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1985 Citroen CX. (137 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1985 Citroen CX.
Because 2003 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Citroen CX. (206 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Cadillac CTS | 1985 Citroen CX | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | CTS | CX |
Year Released | 2003 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 245 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3100 mm |