2003 Caterham 7 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Caterham 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Caterham 7 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Caterham 7 (200 HP) has 101 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Because 2003 Caterham 7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 Caterham 7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Caterham 7 (210 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (130 Nm). This means 2003 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Caterham 7 | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
Make | Caterham | Chevrolet |
Model | 7 | Aveo |
Year Released | 2003 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 99 HP |
Torque | 210 Nm | 130 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2525 mm |