2003 Citroen C2 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2003 Citroen C2 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,124 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Citroen C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Citroen C2 (58 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Citroen C2 weights approximately 186 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Citroen C2 (110 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (78 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 Citroen C2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Citroen C2 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Citroen | Zastava |
| Model | C2 | 102 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1115 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 58 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 78 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 936 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2320 mm | 2160 mm |
