2003 Dodge Ram vs. 1982 Ford Meteor
To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Meteor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Meteor would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1982 Ford Meteor. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Meteor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1045 kg more than 1982 Ford Meteor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (319 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Meteor. (111 Nm). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Meteor.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 Dodge Ram | 1982 Ford Meteor | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Ram | Meteor |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1982 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1490 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 111 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1930 kg | 885 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2370 mm |
