2003 MCC Crossblade vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer (276 HP) has 206 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 610 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer (353 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Crossblade | 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
| Make | MCC | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Crossblade | Lancer |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
| Engine Size | 598 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 276 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1400 mm |
