2003 Renault Megane vs. 1999 Rover 25
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Rover 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Rover 25 would be higher. At 1,950 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Rover 25 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Megane (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1999 Rover 25. (104 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1999 Rover 25.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Rover 25 (240 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Megane. (106 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1999 Rover 25 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2003 Renault Megane | 1999 Rover 25 | |
Make | Renault | Rover |
Model | Megane | 25 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1870 cc | 1950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 106 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 93 mm | 88.9 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 50 L |