2004 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML

To start off, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Cadillac Escalade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Cadillac Escalade would be higher. At 5,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML (518 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 2004 Cadillac Escalade. (345 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 2004 Cadillac Escalade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 322 kg more than 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML.

With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML (699 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Cadillac Escalade. (515 Nm). This means 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Cadillac Escalade.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Cadillac Escalade 2012 Mercedes-Benz ML
Make Cadillac Mercedes-Benz
Model Escalade ML
Year Released 2004 2012
Body Type Pickup SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5996 cc 5461 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 345 HP 518 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 515 Nm 699 Nm
Drive Type 4WD AWD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2667 kg 2345 kg
Vehicle Length 5630 mm 4803 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 2141 mm
Vehicle Height 1930 mm 1796 mm
Wheelbase Size 3310 mm 2916 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 13.8 L/100km 9.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 18.1 L/100km 15.7 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 117 L 105 L