2004 Caterham 7 vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2004 Caterham 7 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Caterham 7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Caterham 7 (251 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 202 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Caterham 7 should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Zastava 102 weights approximately 300 kg more than 2004 Caterham 7.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Caterham 7 (258 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Caterham 7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Caterham 7 | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Caterham | Zastava |
| Model | 7 | 102 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 470 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3110 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 810 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2160 mm |
