2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo (180 HP) has 8 more horse power than 2008 Jeep Wrangler. (172 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo should accelerate faster than 2008 Jeep Wrangler.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. (278 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2008 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
Model | Monte Carlo | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3392 cc | 3979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 172 HP |
Torque | 278 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 87 mm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1820 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 14.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 72 L |