2004 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (179 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2004 Chrysler Voyager. (150 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 2004 Chrysler Voyager.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Chrysler Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler Voyager. (218 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chrysler Voyager | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
Model | Voyager | Colt |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 2972 cc |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 255 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 12.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 95 L |