2004 Citroen C2 vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 2004 Citroen C2 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Citroen C2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Citroen C2 (106 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C2 should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Citroen C2 weights approximately 235 kg more than 1976 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Citroen C2 | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C2 | 66 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1055 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1390 mm |