2004 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 2004 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,108 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Daewoo Matiz (51 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Daewoo Matiz should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Volvo 66 weights approximately 42 kg more than 2004 Daewoo Matiz.
Because 1976 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Daewoo Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Daewoo Matiz | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Daewoo | Volvo |
Model | Matiz | 66 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 794 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 778 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1390 mm |