2004 Ford E-250 vs. 1981 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1981 Seat Ritmo. (63 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1981 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1488 kg more than 1981 Seat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 297 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Seat Ritmo. (92 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Seat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford E-250 | 1981 Seat Ritmo | |
| Make | Ford | Seat |
| Model | E-250 | Ritmo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 63 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6150 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 389 Nm | 92 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 2370 kg | 882 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5900 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2460 mm |
