2004 Ford Econoline vs. 1999 Opel Omega
To start off, 2004 Ford Econoline is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Opel Omega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Opel Omega would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Opel Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Opel Omega (311 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2004 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econoline weights approximately 635 kg more than 1999 Opel Omega.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Opel Omega (459 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1999 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Econoline | 1999 Opel Omega | |
Make | Ford | Opel |
Model | Econoline | Omega |
Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 5665 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 338 Nm | 459 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2325 kg | 1690 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2740 mm |