2004 Ford Puma vs. 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V
To start off, 2004 Ford Puma is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V would be higher.
Because 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Puma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V has automatic transmission and 2004 Ford Puma has manual transmission. 2004 Ford Puma will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Ford Puma | 1987 Mitsubishi HSR-V | |
| Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Puma | HSR-V |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1987 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
