2004 Ford Ranger vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford E-Series is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford E-Series weights approximately 1110 kg more than 2004 Ford Ranger.
Because 2004 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Ford E-Series. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Ford E-Series has automatic transmission and 2004 Ford Ranger has manual transmission. 2004 Ford Ranger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford E-Series will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Ford Ranger | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Ranger | E-Series |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Pickup | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 252 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 4-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 1511 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 2830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 5504 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 2111 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3010 mm | 3505 mm |