2004 Jaguar XK vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jaguar XK would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 493 kg more than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Because 2004 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (541 Nm) has 386 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Countryman. (155 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Countryman.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jaguar XK | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
Make | Jaguar | Mini |
Model | XK | Countryman |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 541 Nm | 155 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1833 kg | 1340 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4097 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1993 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1561 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2595 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.2 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 47 L |