2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2011 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2011 Ford C-Max is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2011 Ford C-Max. (95 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 389 kg more than 2011 Ford C-Max. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Ford C-Max. (230 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Ford C-Max.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2011 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Jeep | Ford |
Model | Grand Cherokee | C-Max |
Year Released | 2004 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 195 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1764 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1626 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2648 mm |