2004 Nissan Sentra vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Nissan Sentra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Nissan Sentra would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2004 Nissan Sentra. (127 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan Sentra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan Sentra. (175 Nm). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan Sentra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Nissan Sentra | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Sentra | E-350 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1770 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 127 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 184 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4520 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 6.7 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 8.4 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 57 L |