2004 SsangYong Musso vs. 2013 Volvo S60
To start off, 2013 Volvo S60 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 SsangYong Musso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 SsangYong Musso would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2004 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo S60 (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 129 more horse power than 2004 SsangYong Musso. (118 HP @ 4100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 2004 SsangYong Musso.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo S60 (361 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 SsangYong Musso. (305 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 SsangYong Musso.
Compare all specifications:
2004 SsangYong Musso | 2013 Volvo S60 | |
Make | SsangYong | Volvo |
Model | Musso | S60 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2874 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 247 HP |
Engine RPM | 4100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 361 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 151 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 16.4 seconds | 7.5 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 2097 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1484 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2776 mm |