2005 Audi A3 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Triax
To start off, 2005 Audi A3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Triax. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Triax would be higher. At 1,595 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Audi A3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 393 kg more than 2005 Audi A3.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Audi A3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Audi A3 | 2000 Chevrolet Triax | |
| Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
| Model | A3 | Triax |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1595 cc | 660 cc |
| Horse Power | 101 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1598 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2790 mm |
