2005 Audi A6 vs. 2000 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2005 Audi A6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Holden Commodore (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 2005 Audi A6. (178 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2005 Audi A6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Audi A6 weights approximately 300 kg more than 2000 Holden Commodore.
Because 2005 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Audi A6 (320 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Holden Commodore. (304 Nm). This means 2005 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Audi A6 | 2000 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | A6 | Commodore |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 3791 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 5 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 178 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 304 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1610 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2950 mm |