2005 BMW 325 vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 BMW 325. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 BMW 325 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW 325 (189 HP) has 36 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW 325 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Because 2005 BMW 325 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 BMW 325. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 BMW 325 (245 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2005 BMW 325 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
2005 BMW 325 | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 325 | Epica |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 245 Nm | 237 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.2 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |