2005 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 1980 Zastava 132
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 5,799 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina (325 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1980 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 1980 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Lumina weights approximately 565 kg more than 1980 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Lumina (460 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 317 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Zastava 132. (143 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Lumina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Lumina | 1980 Zastava 132 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Zastava |
Model | Lumina | 132 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1980 |
Engine Size | 5799 cc | 1756 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 325 HP | 106 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 460 Nm | 143 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 1095 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2560 mm |