2005 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1963 NSU 1000 LS
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 LS would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker (98 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. (42 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 LS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. (70 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU 1000 LS.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Tracker | 1963 NSU 1000 LS | |
Make | Chevrolet | NSU |
Model | Tracker | 1000 LS |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 42 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 70 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2260 mm |