2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1981 Fiat Argenta
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 4,157 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (270 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1981 Fiat Argenta. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1981 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Fiat Argenta. (136 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1981 Fiat Argenta | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | TrailBlazer | Argenta |
Year Released | 2005 | 1981 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4157 cc | 1585 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 270 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 71.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 35 L |