2005 Chevrolet Uplander vs. 1982 Seat 127
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat 127 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Uplander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander (200 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1982 Seat 127. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander should accelerate faster than 1982 Seat 127. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Uplander weights approximately 1323 kg more than 1982 Seat 127. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Uplander (298 Nm) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Seat 127. (64 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Uplander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Seat 127.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Uplander | 1982 Seat 127 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Seat |
Model | Uplander | 127 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3491 cc | 903 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 64 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2028 kg | 705 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 3600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2230 mm |