2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2010 Honda Accord
To start off, 2010 Honda Accord is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 3,516 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Accord (271 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Accord should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 95 kg more than 2010 Honda Accord.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Honda Accord (344 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (340 Nm). This means 2010 Honda Accord will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2010 Honda Accord | |
Make | Chrysler | Honda |
Model | 300 | Accord |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3516 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 344 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1709 kg | 1614 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1847 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1476 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3190 mm | 2799 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 70 L |