2005 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2001 Suzuki SX
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Suzuki SX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Suzuki SX would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (331 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 2001 Suzuki SX. (126 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 2001 Suzuki SX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Suzuki SX weights approximately 26 kg more than 2005 Chrysler Crossfire.
Because 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Chrysler Crossfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Suzuki SX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (420 Nm) has 314 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Suzuki SX. (106 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Suzuki SX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chrysler Crossfire | 2001 Suzuki SX | |
| Make | Chrysler | Suzuki |
| Model | Crossfire | SX |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3196 cc | 1298 cc |
| Horse Power | 331 HP | 126 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1536 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2460 mm |
