2006 Audi A3 vs. 1949 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2006 Audi A3 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1949 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A3 (197 HP) has 112 more horse power than 1949 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3 should accelerate faster than 1949 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A3 weights approximately 250 kg more than 1949 Volvo PV 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1949 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi A3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi A3 | 1949 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Audi | Volvo |
| Model | A3 | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 2006 | 1949 |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 3670 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 85 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2850 mm |
