2006 BMW 130 vs. 1962 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2006 BMW 130 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 130 (261 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1962 Cadillac 62. (197 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 130 should accelerate faster than 1962 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW 130. (315 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW 130.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 130 | 1962 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 130 | 62 |
Year Released | 2006 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 6388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 582 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 98.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 75 L |