2006 BMW 545 vs. 2003 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 BMW 545 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 3 would be higher. At 2,494 cc, 2006 BMW 545 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW 545 (328 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 3. (160 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW 545 should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 3.
Because 2006 BMW 545 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 BMW 545. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 BMW 545 (450 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 3. (195 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 BMW 545 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW 545 | 2003 Mazda 3 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | 545 | 3 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 1999 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 450 Nm | 195 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 5.8 seconds | 9 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.9 L/100km | 8.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |