2006 BMW MM Roadster vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 BMW MM Roadster. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 BMW MM Roadster would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 BMW MM Roadster (330 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2008 Mazda CX-9. (270 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 BMW MM Roadster should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda CX-9.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (370 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 BMW MM Roadster. (355 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 BMW MM Roadster.
Compare all specifications:
2006 BMW MM Roadster | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | MM Roadster | CX-9 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3245 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 355 Nm | 370 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 76 L |