2006 Cadillac SRX vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2006 Cadillac SRX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac SRX (320 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 581 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Cadillac SRX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Lancia Nea. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac SRX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac SRX (427 Nm) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Lancia Nea. (314 Nm). This means 2006 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Lancia Nea.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Cadillac SRX | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
Model | SRX | Nea |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4572 cc | 2445 cc |
Horse Power | 320 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 427 Nm | 314 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1951 kg | 1370 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2590 mm |