2006 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 2001 Proton 400
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Proton 400 would be higher. At 2,770 cc, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (173 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 2001 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado should accelerate faster than 2001 Proton 400.
Because 2006 Chevrolet Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Chevrolet Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Colorado (251 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 143 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Chevrolet Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Chevrolet Colorado | 2001 Proton 400 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Proton |
Model | Colorado | 400 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2770 cc | 1298 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3200 mm | 2510 mm |