2006 Dodge Ram vs. 2004 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (345 HP) has 190 more horse power than 2004 Mercury Sable. (155 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercury Sable. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Dodge Ram weights approximately 830 kg more than 2004 Mercury Sable. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercury Sable. (251 Nm). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercury Sable.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Dodge Ram | 2004 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Dodge | Mercury |
Model | Ram | Sable |
Year Released | 2006 | 2004 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5621 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 509 Nm | 251 Nm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2343 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5840 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1990 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 68 L |